RG Digital Medicine

The Digital Medicine Working Group at the University of Bremen is focused on the digital support of diagnosis and therapy. We analyze medical data using data-driven and biophysical models and process the results accordingly to support decision-making. Our goal is to make the daily routine easier for clinical users and to improve the quality of care. To achieve this, we engage in intensive exchanges with various clinical stakeholders who support us with their expertise and clinical data.

Gezeigt wird der Magenbereich schematisch segmentiert mit verschiedenen Strukturen sowie eine Darstellung des segmentierten Gehirns.

Research

  • Image & Data Analysis

  • Modelling & Simulation

  • Image Registration

  • Visualization and Interaction

more

Contact

RG Digital Medicine

Faculty 3 - Mathematics and Computer Science

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Horst Hahn

Max-von-Laue-Straße 2

28359 Bremen

Telephone: +49 421 218-59002

Email

Office

Marlott Hederich

Telephone: +49 421 218-64430

Email

News

Erik Immoor will present his master's thesis at VCBM 2024

Erik Immoor will present his master's thesis "Potential of Tetrahedral Markers for Infrared Pose Tracking in Surgical Navigation" at VCBM 2024 in Magdeburg. His work was accepted as a short paper and will be shown on September 19th at 12:00.

Abstract of the thesis:

Optical tracking systems predominantly rely on spherical retroreflective markers, requiring at least three features to achieve a complete six degrees of freedom (6D) pose estimation. Despite the potential advantages of a single non-spherical marker for 6D pose estimation, this approach has received limited attention in the literature. This study investigates the feasibility of non-spherical retroreflective markers, particularly tetrahedral markers, as alternatives to spherical features. Simulations and digital post-processing were conducted using Blender to generate stereo images of both spherical and tetrahedral markers. The standard marker tracking was adjusted to use the vertices of the tetrahedra instead of the centers of the spheres. The results indicate that spherical markers provide slightly more precise tracking in the simulated scenario, while tetrahedral markers offer advantages in practical applications, such as an extended field of view. These findings suggest that non-spherical markers warrant further exploration to assess their potential to enhance optical tracking systems in real-world applications.

Vergleich von sphärischen Markern gegenüber Tetraeder Markern.